There is a blog I frequent called the “Art Of Manliness.” This blog mainly focuses on the classical manliness that was a part of our culture in the 19th and 20th centuries. After coming into my awareness, the quote “You have to be a man, before you can be a gentleman”, makes a lot more sense.
As the human race pushes forward, everyone wants to define their own form of masculinity — one that includes themselves in most cases. Men want to know they’re men, and rationalizing the attributes to fit themselves helps. Why? I think the issue is because, they feel they must fit more than one role in society today. And so, he begins to tag excess attributes on to manliness to fit all the roles he perceives he needs to play. These attributes to fit his identity, but as a result, cause confusion in his attempts to simplify what a man is. After much thought, I don’t think this process is necessary — at least not for me.
In essence, the son becomes a man once he strives to better himself, for himself (independence). His creations by design service his inner creativity; subject to criticism from others, but continues on the path he’s chosen for himself. Feelings and virtues in his adolescence that have yet to be changed by external forces. He’s on an adventure, by himself, adapting, and as a result becomes more independent. Fostered through challenge and experience, a character that refuse stagnation. Self sacrifice is not the mark of a man, but the survival of all he holds dear (including himself) is the key; he is not expendable. The “gentleman” is just the chivalrous sugar over the raw character, that can be easily switched off.